托福独立写作，观点千万不要“一边倒”
写好托福独立写作需要掌握一定的技巧，托福独立写作，观点千万不要“一边倒”是怎么一回事呢?想知道的话来看看这篇文章吧!
托福独立写作，观点千万不要“一边倒”
托福独立写作中，ETS 一般都会问“Do you agree or disagree with thefollowing statement A”。一般来说， 明确的观点可能就是“我同意A”或者“我反对A”。而当写同意A 的文章时，肯定就要极力呈现A 的诸多优点;反之，当对A 持坚决反对的态度时，则会疯狂地列举出A 的种.种缺点。虽然这两种写法都符合“中心论点明确”这个原则，却都过于极端，属于“一边倒”的情形。
事实上，生活中的事物都是较为复杂的。有些事物具有两面性，优缺点并存，如科技可以提高人类的生活质量，但也会带来环境问题，进而降低人类的生活质量。而有些事物本身是中性的，只代表客观情况，它们给人带来的或好或坏的影响完全取决于其他外部条件，如“电视给社会带来正面还是负面影响”这一话题。要知道，电视本身是没有意识的，它不会主动地影响人们以至于社会，实际上在影响大众的是通过电视传播信息或内容的人。
启德考培产品中心总经理、启德国际教育规划院院长刘文勇说，“对于前者——具有两面性的事物，我们可以有所侧重地论述其中的一面，但是也要注意文章观点的完整性，不能为了重点突出它的优点而完全忽略它的缺点，或是为了强调它的缺点而从头到尾对它的优点只字不提，这种做法是不理智的。”
“而对于中性的事物，我们亦不可摒弃‘具体情况，具体分析’的原则，如果忽视其他影响因素和外部条件而简单地将其归类到或好或坏的行列都是不合适的。事实上，写文章要严谨，而某物一定好或一定坏的片面文章显然是不够严谨的。”
如何才能同时做到“观点明确”且“严谨不极端”?刘文勇推荐“让步写法”和“居中写法”两种写作方式。
“一般情况下，当想要论述一个事物的优点大于其自身的缺点(或反之，缺点大于优点)时，或者当想要描述一个事物的优点/ 缺点大于另外一个事物的优点/ 缺点(两个事物进行比较)时，建议大家最好采用‘让步写法’。‘让步写法’涉及两个事物的比较时，其中一个事物的优点往往会是另一个事物的缺点，反之亦然，所以二者是此消彼长、紧密联系的。”
“参加诸如SAT 和GRE 等注重思辨性思维(criticalthinking)的考试时，尽可能多地采用这种‘明确但不极端’的观点。因为‘明确’只是意味着观点本身清楚，而未必是必须倒向其中的某一方，居中型的观点同样能表明坚定的立场。而且，居中型的观点更容易体现作者能客观地看待事物。“当我们阐述一个居中型观点时，显然参与论述的信息就更多了——讨论对象的优点和缺点全部囊括。如此，必然要从辩证的角度来分析信息。当我们尝试从辩证的角度去写文章的时候，文章无疑也就显得更加严谨了。”
具体来讲，什么时候推荐采用“居中写法”呢?刘文勇建议可以分成两种情况。“情况一：两个事物进行比较时，无法简单地判定哪个更好或哪个更差时，可采用‘居中写法’。
情况二：一个事物如果优点和缺点各占一半，没有明显的好，也没有明显的坏时，我们也提倡用‘居中写法’。”
托福独立写作范文：旅行交通工具
You need to travel from your home to a place 40 miles (64 kilometers) away. Compare the different kinds of transportation you could use. Tell which method of travel you would choose. Give specific reasons for your choice.
There are many different types of transportation which I could use to travel 40 miles from my home. The type of transportation I would choose depends mainly on how fast I need to get there and how much money I have. Some possibilities are walking, horseback riding, driving, or using a taxi, bus, or train.
The most economical choice is walking. It costs nothing, is healthful, but it is time consuming. The average person can walk about 4-5 miles per hour, so this trip would take at least 10 hours to complete. That means I would probably have to spend the night somewhere along the way. If I have to spend money for a hotel, then this choice really isn't free. Plus, I might arrive at the end tired and with sore feet! After walking comes animal transportation. In my area, horses are not common, so it wouldn't be a likely choice. I believe that a 40-mile trip would take 2 or 3 hours on a horse. If I had free access to a horse, the cost would be minimal. Of course, I'd have to know how to ride!
With a car, the travel time is minimal (under one hour), with only the cost of gasoline to consider. However, I don't own a car, and car rentals are expensive. Shared taxis are one form of affordable transportation, with 4 or 5 people sharing the cost of a car trip to a common destination. The only downside is finding people to share the fare with me. Fortunately, I live in an urban area, where there are buses and 'trains to ride. One of these would be my first choice.
In short the kind of transportation depends on how fast I need to get to my destination and how much money I have. If I need to get there fast, and money isn't important, I can hire a private e I don't own my own car, I don't have that option, and I have never walked 40 miles in one trip. I usually depend on the bus and trains, and would do so in this circumstance. They are cheap, dependable and reliable.
托福独立写作范文：高等教育提供人群划分
Some people believe that a college or university education should be available to all students. Others believe that higher education should be available only to good students. Discuss these views. Which view do you agree with? Explain why.
Depending on personal experience, personality type and emotional concern, some people hold the opinion that a college education should be available to all students; meanwhile others consider the idea that higher education should be available only to good students in somehow more preferable.
As far as I am concerned, I have to declare myself as one of these who agree that higher education should be offered to all the students. Among countless factors which influence my choice, there are three conspicuous aspects listed as follows.
The first and foremost cause for my propensity is that all students should have the same opportunity to attain a further chance of studying. Born equally as all of us, it is impartial that we all can approach a better education. From the view of equity, it will be unfair that some students get the best possible education while others are denied from a college education.
Another reason why I cast my preference for the point that higher education should open to all students is that our high-education should serve the function of educating the whole country, not merely for a minority of its people.
Beyond these obvious aspects, there is a further subtle point which we must take into our account. It would not be too kindly disposed to the bare idea that allowing barely fantastic students to enter universities, because it is economical for part of people to be better educated with limited resources of all kinds. Nonetheless, pound for pound, I reckon that the consideration that higher education should be accessible to all students is awfully advantageous.
To sum up, a higher education is never absolutely just a dream of the students without a terrific mark. It is a dilemma forthe public to choose from the two object opinions because they are from time to time confused by the seemingly good qualities of the thinking that higher education is available merely to good students but neglect the genuinely good qualities of the true one. From the factors presented above, I strongly commit to the notion that a further education should be rendered more widely and openly.
